We build a private RAG system over your firm’s own documents, so your team finds the exact clause, precedent or piece of evidence in seconds — cited to the source, or an honest “not found.” Over your existing DMS. No rip-and-replace.
Four practice areas, four different jobs — the same private RAG underneath: cited answers over your own matter files, or an honest “not found.”
The situation. You’re running diligence on an acquisition. The target has 300+ commercial contracts to review before signing — in weeks, not months.
The pain. Associates read every agreement by hand hunting for change-of-control, assignment, exclusivity, MFN and liability-cap clauses. Miss one and your client inherits a landmine — and your firm inherits the negligence claim.
What we do. Ask “which contracts have a change-of-control clause?” and get every hit linked to the exact clause — or an honest “not found.” An auto-built clause register across the entire data room.
The payoff. ~60% less review time per deal (≈60 associate hours), nothing critical slips, billable capacity redeployed. Working on your own data room in 2–4 weeks.
The situation. Thousands of documents in a matter. You need the one email, admission or contract term that makes or breaks the argument.
The pain. Keyword search returns 4,000 hits or zero. Building a chronology or finding a single quote means days of manual review under court deadlines.
What we do. Ask in plain English across the whole matter and get cited passages — every answer points to the source document and page. It refuses to guess when the evidence isn’t there.
The payoff. Days of review become minutes; faster, stronger case prep; nothing missed before a filing. Indexed and answering on your matter files in 2–4 weeks.
The situation. A client faces a regulatory audit. You must show, fast, that they met specific obligations across contracts and policies.
The pain. The evidence is scattered across hundreds of documents in the DMS, email and partners’ local files. Assembling it by hand burns days and risks gaps.
What we do. Ask “where do we evidence compliance with [requirement]?” and get the exact clauses and documents, cited — plus a clear “not found” where a gap exists, so you see it before the regulator does.
The payoff. Audit-ready, sourced evidence in hours not weeks; gaps surfaced early. Live on the relevant document set in 2–4 weeks.
The situation. A lean, high-density practice where a few partners hold the client history in their heads.
The pain. When a senior associate or partner leaves, the “where’s the precedent / what did we agree last time” knowledge walks out the door. And a boutique can’t justify a firm-wide platform with 25-seat minimums.
What we do. A searchable, cited memory over your client and matter history — pay for the workflow, not per seat, over your existing DMS. A fast partner-level decision, no innovation committee.
The payoff. Every lawyer finds prior clauses, precedents and positions in seconds; knowledge stays when people leave; enterprise-grade capability at boutique cost. Pilot on your own files in 2–4 weeks.
We layer over your existing document and review platforms — nothing to migrate, no new place to store documents.
Runs over your existing DMS. You own the solution — no 25-seat minimum, no rip-and-replace, no innovation committee required to get started.
A human stays in the loop on every judgment call. The system surfaces cited evidence — your lawyers decide.
Each matter’s documents are walled off from every other matter and client. Privilege-aware by design.
Every answer links to the source clause or document. If it isn’t in the file, it says so — never invents.
OCR turns image-only PDFs and productions into searchable, cited text.
Your matter files are never used to train shared models.
In 2–4 weeks we run it on a sample of your own matter files or contracts, measure accuracy on your questions, and show the ROI — before any commitment.
Not a mockup of a mockup — this is the actual live demo, screen for screen: retrieval-augmented answers over real documents, clickable citations, and an honest guardrail.
3 of 12 agreements contain a change-of-control provision: Vendor MSA §11.2, Distribution Agreement §7.4, Services Agreement §14.1. (Source: cited)
Not found in the provided documents.
In progress — report available under NDA once complete.
Deploy in your region — US or EU.
Each matter’s data is walled off — no cross-matter leakage.
Role-based access plus a tamper-evident audit trail.
Run fully inside your firm’s own environment.
Your matter files are never used to train shared models.
The system extracts facts and cites its source — it doesn’t give legal advice, and a lawyer reviews every output before it’s relied on. We measure accuracy, citation correctness and hallucination rate on a labelled set of your own questions before you rely on it for real work.
Each matter is isolated from every other matter and client. Your choice of data residency (US or EU), an LLM that doesn’t train on your data, or a fully on-prem deployment. Access is role-based and every action is logged — built with professional privilege in mind.
No. We add a search and citation layer over your existing DMS — iManage, NetDocuments, Relativity, SharePoint. Nothing to migrate, nothing new to store documents in.
Scans and image-only productions are processed with OCR into searchable, cited text and indexed alongside your native files.
You pay for the workflow, not per seat, so there’s no 25-seat minimum. It runs directly over your existing DMS instead of a separate walled-garden platform, and you own the solution — no rip-and-replace, no long procurement cycle.
Tell us about your practice area and the documents your team keeps digging through. We’ll show the live demo and scope a paid pilot on your own files.